{"id":666,"date":"2013-04-20T18:33:06","date_gmt":"2013-04-20T22:33:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/?p=666"},"modified":"2013-04-20T18:34:30","modified_gmt":"2013-04-20T22:34:30","slug":"knitters-were-smaller-in-1962","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/","title":{"rendered":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>On Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines<\/h1>\n<p>For my upcoming book, I&#8217;ve been reading a lot of 1960s era knitting magazines, Since the book will be a pattern book of stranded colorwork patterns, I&#8217;m focusing mostly on the patterns, but I am noticing a lot of other interesting things, too. Today I&#8217;m discussing pattern sizing \u2014 were knitters smaller in 1962?<\/p>\n<p>I refer to this photo of a size chart, from the Spring\/Summer 1962 McCalls Needlework &amp; crafts magazine:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_667\" style=\"width: 460px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-667\" class=\"size-full wp-image-667\" alt=\"1962 Size Chart\" src=\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Size-Chart-Web.jpg\" width=\"450\" height=\"365\" srcset=\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Size-Chart-Web.jpg 450w, http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Size-Chart-Web-300x243.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-667\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Size Chart from Spring\/Summer 1962 McCalls Needlework &amp; crafts<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The largest Misses size is for a 40&#8243; bust!<\/p>\n<p>This was surprising. I know people do weigh more now than in the past, but a 40&#8243; bustline in 2013\u00a0 a medium at most. The chart does list a Woman&#8217;s size range, for &#8220;full-figured gals&#8221;, but even here, the largest size is for a 48&#8243; bust.<\/p>\n<p>To compare, I&#8217;m using the <a title=\"LL Bean Size Chart\" href=\"http:\/\/www.llbean.com\/llb\/shop\/510625?bvCategory=510625&amp;nav=ftlink#\" target=\"_blank\">LLBean size chart<\/a>. I chose this one, because it is unlikely to be affected by vanity sizing. The smallest modern size is a 4, or 34-26 1\/2-36 1\/2, which is about the same as a 1962 size 14, in the middle of the range. A 1962 size 20 would be a modern Large, and the largest 1962 Woman&#8217;s size would be a 2X today.<\/p>\n<p>Men&#8217;s sizes are the same as 51 years ago, but there were no sizes for XL, 2XL or 3XL.<\/p>\n<p>To add to the difference, very few of the magazine&#8217;s patterns had sizes beyond a 36&#8243; or 38&#8243; bust.<\/p>\n<p>McCall&#8217;s was not a high fashion magazine. The garments were intended to fit average people. Now, even the largest patterns would be a size Small. Makes you want to start that diet, huh?<\/p>\n<p>My book will not be reproducing the tiny patterns from the 1960s. Instead, I&#8217;ll be giving you just the color patterns, plus instructions on how to add them to items that will fit you, whatever size you are.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines For my upcoming book, I&#8217;ve been reading a lot of 1960s era knitting magazines, Since the book will be a pattern book of stranded colorwork patterns, I&#8217;m focusing mostly on the patterns, but I am noticing a lot of other interesting things, too. Today I&#8217;m discussing pattern sizing [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":668,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-knitting"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Knitters Were Smaller in 1962 - Polymath Solution<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962: Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines... very few knitting patterns had sizes beyond a 36&quot; or 38&quot; bust....\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Liz\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Liz\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225\"},\"headline\":\"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-04-20T22:33:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-20T22:34:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\"},\"wordCount\":316,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Knitting\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\",\"name\":\"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962 - Polymath Solution\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-04-20T22:33:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-04-20T22:34:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225\"},\"description\":\"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962: Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines... very few knitting patterns had sizes beyond a 36\\\" or 38\\\" bust....\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg\",\"width\":300,\"height\":118},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Polymath Solution\",\"description\":\"Interesting things, stuff and items\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225\",\"name\":\"Liz\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd57a0579485d7d6e60f0db24ad3ee4bcadcb98c442e23f93311423ffd52d67a?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd57a0579485d7d6e60f0db24ad3ee4bcadcb98c442e23f93311423ffd52d67a?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Liz\"},\"description\":\"Professional polymath, currently earning a living in web and graphic design and development. Also available to teach knitting or chain mail, fix furniture, help design your house, give a lecture on gifted or special education in public schools, or help you with a science fiction con. \\\"Specialization is for insects\\\" and \\\"We also walk dogs\\\", two quotes from Robert Heinlein.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962 - Polymath Solution","description":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962: Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines... very few knitting patterns had sizes beyond a 36\" or 38\" bust....","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Liz","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/"},"author":{"name":"Liz","@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225"},"headline":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962","datePublished":"2013-04-20T22:33:06+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-20T22:34:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/"},"wordCount":316,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg","articleSection":["Knitting"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/","url":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/","name":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962 - Polymath Solution","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg","datePublished":"2013-04-20T22:33:06+00:00","dateModified":"2013-04-20T22:34:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225"},"description":"Knitters Were Smaller in 1962: Size Charts in 1960s Knitting Magazines... very few knitting patterns had sizes beyond a 36\" or 38\" bust....","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/2013\/04\/20\/knitters-were-smaller-in-1962\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg","width":300,"height":118},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#website","url":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/","name":"Polymath Solution","description":"Interesting things, stuff and items","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8aadd911e62a97bd7a148b88033d0225","name":"Liz","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd57a0579485d7d6e60f0db24ad3ee4bcadcb98c442e23f93311423ffd52d67a?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd57a0579485d7d6e60f0db24ad3ee4bcadcb98c442e23f93311423ffd52d67a?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Liz"},"description":"Professional polymath, currently earning a living in web and graphic design and development. Also available to teach knitting or chain mail, fix furniture, help design your house, give a lecture on gifted or special education in public schools, or help you with a science fiction con. \"Specialization is for insects\" and \"We also walk dogs\", two quotes from Robert Heinlein.","sameAs":["http:\/\/polymathsolution.com"],"url":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Body-Measurements-Image-Web.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=666"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/666\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":675,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/666\/revisions\/675"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/polymathsolution.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}